Dynolicious vs. V-Box and Dynojet

PingLog

Ping Your Blog & Get Voted

PingLog Home » Automotive » Dynolicious vs. V-Box and Dynojet

PingLog Vote Button

Add this code to a HTML enabled blog post or article where you want our vote button to appear:

<script type="text/javascript" src="http://www.pinglog.com/evb/button.php"></script>

Hot News

Submit a new story

37
Vote

Dynolicious vs. V-Box and Dynojet

Posted by autoblog 121 days ago (http://feeds.autoblog.com)
Category: Automotive

Filed under: Gadgets, Etc.Click any image for a larger version.Give us an iPhone application that relates to cars and we're all over it. Apparently, so is the crew at Motive. They took out an Audi S5, mounted a Racelogic V-Box onto the windshield and brought along a Dynolicious-equipped iPhone to see how it stacked up.The V-Box uses both GPS and yaw sensor data to serve up 0-60 times, 1/4-mile trap speeds and lateral Gs, whereas the iPhone only makes use of yaw information to deliver the same numbers... along with estimated horsepower figures. While Motive wanted to find out how the Dynolicious would do with 0-60 times, we were interested in how close it would come to wheel horsepower given both an estimated weight and drivetrain loss. That meant hitting up the Dynojet at Modacar and strapping our own Project Track Slut onto the rollers.Read on for both Motive's conclusions and our own.Gallery: Dynolicious vs. V-Box and DynojetContinue reading Dynolicious vs. V-Box and Dynojet Permalink | Email this | Comments